Slippery Slope to Socialism

My thoughts on President Obama's proposed healthcare reform are ambivalent. For all practical matters- having everyone insured, and preventing the rise of insurance premiums- I believe it is great. However, I simultaneously feel that government takeover of healthcare comes from a very relaxed reading of the powers granted in the Constitution.

Because the President's bold moves in healthcare and economic reform have philanthropic intentions, I have ignored the accusations of socialism he has been barraged with. However, an article I read in the New York Times today made me reconsider what (I realize I may lose many friends over this next statement) Glenn Beck, amongst others, have said about him.

The article, found here, was talking about the Obama administration's plan to reduce childhood obesity. What gave me trouble was this: "In legislation, soon to be introduced, candy and sugary beverages would be banned and many schools would be required to offer more nutritious fare." The strong language (banned, required) seems unnecessarily dictatorial. Again, like healthcare reform, this plan has a great purpose, but its implementation involves a restriction of freedom.

Don't get me wrong, I know obesity is a big problem in this country, and I applaud Michelle Obama for taking on this effort. But I believe education is the way to go, not legislation. Inform the public, inform the children, inform their parents. Countless times on subways I have seen teenage parents giving their children soda and fries, and it's all I can do not to bust out diagrams showing the progression of atherosclerosis and diabetes. Once the public has been informed, it is their decision to eat healthier or continue with junk food- it is their right. No matter how loosely you interpret the Constitution, nowhere does it grant the federal government the right to restrict our diets.

Normally I could care less about what the average American eats, as long as I eat healthy, and teach my friends and family to do the same. If someone wants to eat McDonald's to their fast-approaching grave, they can knock themselves out, it's just natural selection at play. Now here's the catch: if healthcare is government-funded, and my tax dollars are paying to give Joe Krispy Kreme multiple balloon angioplasties, suddenly the diet of 304 million people becomes my problem. Socialism is self-perpetuating.

So, it makes me rather unhappy to say, that I do believe the Obama administration is heading down the slippery slope to socialism. I don't believe it is intentional or ill-minded, but I acknowledge it is happening. If a few administrations of strict governmental regulation are what we need to get the economy back to Clinton years, then it might be a welcome change.